More slasher and proto-slasher discs are on their way.
October 13: The Stepfather
This terrific 1987 slasher has been M.I.A. on DVD for far too long. Lost’s Terry O’Quinn stars as a family man who, when disappointed by his family, simply kills them, changes his identity, and moves on to a new family until they, inevitably, disappoint him too. A Shout! Factory release, the Stepfather disc features a commentary from director Joseph Ruben, a retrospective documentary, and the original US theatrical trailer. US retail: $19.99
October 13: The William Castle Collection
Once they’ve gone OOP, some discs of William Castle’s fun flicks are notoriously hard (i.e. expensive) to get a hold of. Sony Pictures rectifies this to some degree (it packs a mighty price tag) with the release of The William Castle Collection, including Homicidal (see Proto-Slashers review on this site) and Straight-Jacket, starring Joan Crawford as an axe-murderess who is released after years in an asylum. The set also includes 13 Frightened Girls, 13 Ghosts, Mr. Sardonicus, the remake of James Whale’s classic The Old Dark House, The Tingler, and Zotz. The collection features a ton of extras, but missing from the set are I Saw What You Did (again, check out Proto-Slashers here for deets), Macabre, House on Haunted Hill, and Night Walker. Cover art unavailable at this time. US retail: $80.95
November 24: The House on Sorority Row (25th Anniversary Edition)
A terrific slasher flick in the classic mold, 1983’s The House on Sorority Row is a must-have for any slasher fan. After a prank goes awry, someone starts killing the sorority sisters of Theta Pi. Full of memorable characters, smart directorial choices, set pieces, and suspense, HOSR was originally released by Elite Entertainment on DVD in 2000 and again in 2003. The OOP dics are currently selling online around the $50 mark. Liberation Entertainment make this more assessable to slasher fans with a space in their DVD collections for a bloody sorority house. Special Feature details to come. US Retail: $19.95
DVD releases of slasher classics — pristine, uncut, and in their original aspect ratios — are certainly the best thing to come out of the glut of lame slasher movie remakes. Despite the limp PG-13 reincarnations, renewed interest in the originals has created a boon for slasher fans. Sit back, tense up, and enjoy!
Proto-Slashers: Looking at the flicks that paved the way for Halloween and the heyday of slasher movies.
JAWS (1975)
That’s right… Jaws. The story of a killer who terrorizes a small community, leaving many of its inhabitants slashed to bits. Of course, the killer here is a shark and its weapon is its teeth, but underneath its watery surface is a slasher flick of the first order. Especially during its first 3/5’s, Jaws lives up to the traditional slasher formula a full three years before the release of Halloween.
The impact of Jaws is impossible to ignore. After all, this is the film that’s widely considered the first of the summer blockbusters, hitting multiple screens at once and raking in a boat load of cash. Cover stories on all the major (and not so major) publications of the day, special edition shark frenzy magazines, news stories, paperbacks, t-shirts, puzzles, games, LP’s (record albums to the post-80’s crowd), pinball games, etc, etc, etc. Jaws was everywhere. But did it help cement the slasher movie template?
Jaws takes place in a small community. While nerve-jangling theme music fills the soundtrack, the camera assumes the killer’s point of view as the maniac attacks its victims. After a few gory (for its day) deaths occur, those in authority prove to be ineffectual. It’s down to the, not final girl, but the final boy in this case, to stop the killer.
Perhaps it’s in part due to my affinity with slasher movies that I love the first 70 or so minutes of Jaws so much. That’s the part where the shark is hunting prey and the movie is filled with suspense and the kind of thrills I expect from an effective horror flick. I also like the end section of Jaws, but not as much. That part is a more straight forward sea adventure, though still with its fair share of suspense and terror; I love me the Quint-munching and shark cage scenes. But for my money, the real success of Jaws lies in its gill-breathing slasher thrills. It’s also why the first Alien movie will always be my favorite in that series. There’s an unstoppable killer who’s lurking, hunting and dispatching us in spectacular and bloody ways. Who cares if the maniac wears a hockey mask, a glove tricked out with knives, shark skin, or an exoskeleton?
Any other comparisons between Jaws and slasher flicks? Jot ‘em down in the comments section below.
Proto-Slashers: Looking at the flicks that paved the way for Halloween and the heyday of slasher movies.
REPULSION (1965)
Roman Polanski’s first English-language film, Repulsion is a bonafide, certified Retro Slashers classic, and one of the greatest horror movies ever made. It stars Catherine Deneuve as Carol, a repressed young beautician, sharing an apartment with her sister Hélène (Yvonne Furneaux) in London. While Hélène has a healthy relationship with a boyfriend (Ian Hendry), Carol is terrified by sex. Though Colin (John Fraser), an acquaintance of Carol’s, is persistent in his attempts to get to better know the beautiful and mysterious woman, she would rather spend her time at home, quietly feeding her psychosis. When Hélène and her boyfriend leave for a vacation in Italy, Carol goes fully over the deep end, hanging out with a rotting, skinned rabbit corpse, imaging hands pushing out of walls to grab her, seeking cracks suddenly appear in the ceiling, and thinking she is being attacked by unidentified men. Eventually, those who inhabit the physical rather than the imagined world around Carol learn about alternative uses for straight razors and anything else Carol can get her hands on.
Polanski, one of cinema’s greatest directors, was very early in his career with Repulsion, but his command on the medium is clear. It was the first flick in his unofficial “Apartment Trilogy”, followed by “Rosemary’s Baby” and “The Tenant”, each a variation in a theme, exploring supernatural or psychological threats to apartment dwellers. With Repulsion he created a deliberately-paced, realistic study of a person slipping into full-fledged madness. Punctuated by a handful of well-placed, effective scares, some of which have been copied countless times, the film generates a terrific and creepy atmosphere that engrosses the viewer in Carol’s sick world. Though she has a minimum of dialogue, Deneuve is terrific as Carol, ably conveying her alternating helplessness and her misguided need for protective and violent outbursts. Though not a traditional slasher in the sense of an unstoppable killer hunting for victims, Repulsion finds believable ways to do just the opposite, bringing victims to its killer, who also just happens to be one of the most sympathetic in the genre. Unlike many slasher flicks, Repulsion’s ending is tragic, chilling, and thoughtful rather than jolt-inducing.
Available as a Region 2 DVD from Anchor Bay UK and on Region 1 from Program Power Entertainment, Repulsion will finally get the NTSC release it deserves when the Criterion Collection releases it later this month. It’s a must-own for any horror fan who appreciates horror that creeps rather than winks, squirts, or is CGI-generated.
Somebody wants to claim a pregnant woman’s baby for her own. To make matters worse, the baby is still in his mother’s womb.
We’ve all heard shocking news reports (and a few urban legends) about childless women attempting to steal other women’s unborn babies using car keys and other unimaginable surgical instruments. Apparently so have French filmmakers Alexandre Bustillo and Julien Muary who’ve used this Grand Guignol concept as the basis for their amazing 2007 flick Inside (a.k.a. À l’intérieur). The filmmakers build on this twisted premise to deliver one of the most bloody, over-the-top slasher flicks I’ve ever seen. And that’s a good thing.
Alysson Paradis is Sarah, the expectant mother left all alone on the night when “The Woman” comes calling. Played by the great Beatrice Dalle (Trouble Every Day, Betty Blue), “The Woman” is a slicing, dicing force to be reckoned with. After all, Inside is a slasher film of the first order – The filmmakers have even added a knowing tribute to John Carpenter’s Halloween – and it’s amazing to see how many ways Bustillo, who also wrote the screenplay, and Muary have concocted to lure fresh victims to Paradis’ home. The two actresses, however, are the heart of the film, and both are outstanding in their opposing roles, giving a life to each character beyond their time onscreen, fueled by an intense pain that is emotional and very definitely physical at times. In fact, both were awarded for their performances here at the genre film festival at Sitges.
Another key to the film’s success is the underlying emphasis on suspense despite all the red stuff on display. It’s easy to empathize with Paradis as she fights for the life of not just herself, but her baby as well. That poor kid. Not only does Dalle want to tear him from Paradis’ stomach, but he’s also a unconvincingly rendered CGI creation for most of the film. Several times the filmmakers cut to some iffy CGI of Paradis’ in utero baby which can be distracting. It’s no worse than what we’ve sat through in I Am Legend, and it’s miles ahead of the CGI in Renny Harlin’s Exorcist: The Beginning (remember those jackals? P.U.), but still, obvious CGI is one of major filmmaking flaws movie goers are forced to sit through these days. I mean, if I want to see a cartoon, I’ll throw Looney Tunes into the DVD player.
Aside from the occasional CGI shot, Inside requires that viewers suspend their disbelief and accept action that is obviously not 100% realistic. Characters spring up “from the dead” and function with massive head wounds, but we’ve been letting movie characters get away with that for years. If you can put that “No way!” response to sleep for the duration of the movie, you’ll be rewarded with the wettest flick this side of Dead-Alive.
And if you’re one of those people who gets turned off at the very mention of a film in a foreign language, take a chance here. Inside is action-driven rather than dialogue heavy, and the Dimension Extreme DVD comes with the option of watching a dubbed version. Sadly, the DVD also comes with Dimension Extreme’s typical unfortunate cover art that makes the film look like a direct-to-DVD rip-off of Touristas. Their tacky artwork that panders to what they assume the Saw audience will respond to does a disservice to the film.
Inside is a flick that deserves a lot more attention. Maybe that will come with the rumored and unnecessary US remake directed by REC’s Jaume Balagueró. And keep your eyes open for whatever Bustillo and Muary have coming next. Though they were at one time attached to the Hellraiser remake, they are no longer involved with the project. In the meantime, check out Inside, and prepare to say “Ouch!” A lot.
Growing up as a horror fan in Canada during the 70’s and 80’s was a double-edged sword. Yes, we produced a lot of horror flicks during that period, but at the time most of them seemed like half-baked attempts to rip-off American successes. And to a Canadian teen in the 70’s and 80’s, if the slasher flick in question wasn’t American, it wasn’t worth watching (at least until those damn Italian splatter flicks starting infiltrating mom and pop video stores thanks to Wizard Video, but that’s another story). I mean, Hollywood was the home of movies, right, and what teen-ager doesn’t think at one time or another that the place where he or she lives is lame?
To the eagle-eyed Canadian, there were tell-tale signs that the mayhem flickering across our movie or TV screens was not 100% Grade A American slasher content. There were the awkward attempts to disguise the film’s country of origin by sticking American flags in every available corner, the creeping suspicion that all was not as it seemed when character actors you’d seen in countless Canadian TV commercials popped up like dandelions, there was the occasional spotting of Ontario license plates that the film’s budget hadn’t been large enough to deal with, we’d catch actors drinking brands of beer we knew were only sold in Canadian bars, and worst of all… the lilt of our Canadian accent that seemed to add a couple of extra o’s to every vowel. What a difference a few years make… or a couple of decades. Today, some these same films are considered classics of the genre by slasher fans around the world, and I’ve come to embrace Canadiana like I embrace the band Duchess Says, beaver tail pastries, and when need be, Tim Horton’s coffee.
See, Canada’s film industry has always been a micro-industry compared to the output of our American neighbours. To those of you outside our borders, I challenge you to name five Canadian filmmakers. Did you get past David Cronenberg? When you start reducing the numbers to those within a particular genre, like horror, the challenge becomes even more difficult. The fact is we didn’t produce our first horror movie until Julian Roffman’s partial 3-D flick The Mask in 1961. That’s coming pretty late to the party when you consider that the U.S. had been producing classics like Lon Chaney’s The Phantom of the Opera and The Hunchback of Notre Dame since the days of the silents.
Fast forward to the late 1960’s when the government of Canada first created the Canadian Film Development Corporation (later Telefilm). This organization was tasked with stimulating Canadian film production. A few years later in 1975, moviemaking in Canada was further encouraged by a loophole in our tax laws that allowed a 100% tax shelter for anyone investing in Canadian film production. That’s when the industry really kicked into high gear. Although we produced an awful lot of garbage during that period, it was also due to these incentives that David Cronenberg was able to get early work like Shivers (a.k.a. They Came From Within) and Rabid off the ground, and the late, great Bob Clark was able to give us Deathdream, Deranged (both U.S.-Canadian co-productions) and the Canadian proto-slasher classic Black Christmas.
Despite a steady flow of Canuck horror flicks, it was after the international success of Halloween and Friday the 13th that Canada became the place to be if you wanted to shoot a slasher movie. The country’s lightening-fast response to F13 saw Paul Lynch’s Prom Night and Roger Spottiswoode’s Terror Train, each starring Halloween’s Jamie Lee Curtis, both released the same year that Pamela Voorhees was dicing campers at Camp Crystal Lake. A year later, Visiting Hours saw hospital patient Lee (Damien: Omen II) Grant terrorized by a psychotic Michael (Scanners) Ironside, while William Shatner looked on helplessly. Also in 1981, Paul Lynch’s (again) Humongous gave us a half-human weirdo knocking off visitors to a secluded island, though as a slasher flick Humongous is really in its own (junior) league. 1982 was a bloody banner year for Canadian slashers with the release of J. Lee Thompson’s Happy Birthday to Me, George Mihalka’s My Bloody Valentine, and William Fruet’s Funeral Home. Though strippers were being stalked in 1983’s American Nightmare directed by Don McBrearty, the last standout Canadian slasher was also released that same year with Jonathan Stryker’s Curtains. Say what you will about the muddled plot, but the scene on the ice with the hag mask and the scythe is the stuff of nightmares, and I mean that in the most positive sense.
Though the glory days of Canada’s slasher movies and the tax shelter break are long behind us, these films have been rediscovered by younger genre fans. This is in part due to the fact that some have been through the remake meat grinder as well as the accessibility of the originals through DVD. Hell, this has even given me a chance to re-evaluate some of the classics I dismissed when they first hit my snowy Canadian multiplex. And the horror genre itself, just like Telefilm, is alive and kicking in Canada. With George Romero shooting his zombie flicks in Toronto, and Canadian output such as Andrew Currie’s Fido, Bruce La Bruce’s Otto: or Up With Dead People, Rodrigo Gudiño’s shorts The Eyes of Edward James, The Demonology of Desire and The Facts in the Case of Mister Hollow, Bruce MacDonald’s Pontypool, and Canadian-French co-pros like Pascal Laugier’s Martyrs recently hitting theatres and DVD shelves, Canada’s horror future is virtually undead. For indispensable information about the Canadian horror film industry, check out Caelum Vatnsdal’s They Came From Within; A History of Canadian Horror Cinema published by Arbeiter Ring Publishing, www.canuxploitation.com, and any issue of Rue Morgue magazine.
On July 29, the Criterion Collection will release Roman Polanski’s proto-slasher classic “Repulsion” starring Catherine Deneuve. This 1965 flick features Deneuve as a paranoid psychotic who loses all grip on reality when her sister/roommate goes away for the weekend. Ceilings crack, hands reach out of walls, a bunny corpse starts to rot, and Deneuve finds interesting uses for a straight razor. Polanski’s first English-language film, “Repulsion” is a bonefide classic. Look for the director in a brief cameo.
Disc special features include:
New, restored high-definition digital transfer (with an uncompressed monaural soundtrack on the Blu-ray editi
Audio commentary featuring director Roman Polanski and actress Catherine Deneuve
A British Horror Film (2003), a documentary on the making of Repulsion, featuring interviews with Polanski, producer Gene Gutowski, and cinematographer Gil Taylor
A 1964 television documentary filmed on the set of Repulsion, featuring rare footage of Polanski and Deneuve at work
Theatrical trailer
PLUS: A booklet featuring an essay by film scholar and curator Bill Horrigan
Proto-Slashers: Looking at the flicks that paved the way for Halloween and the heyday of slasher movies.
The House That Screamed (1969)
Someone is killing the students at a private girls school. Sounds like the premise for any one of countless 80’s slasher flicks, but in this case it’s the plot of the 1969 proto-slasher, The House That Screamed (aka La Residencia and The Finishing School).
Directed by Narcisco Ibáñez Serrador, who also directed the essential Who Can Kill a Child?, this Spanish flick is not to be confused with the 2000 US release of the same name. Set in the early 1900’s, Serrador’s film follows the arrival of new student Theresa (Christina Galbó) as she is enrolled at a creepy girls’ school run by the strict head mistress, Mme. Fourneau (Lilli Palmer). Mme. Fourneau has a unique way of punishing disobedient students. Refuse to copy her dictation and she’ll lock you in a room where teacher’s pet Irene (Mary Maude) and her cronies will strip you nude and whip you. Irene and her pals enjoy the power and the punishment far too much, and Mme. Fourneau is a little too sadism-happy herself as she kisses a student’s bloody back saying, “You made me do this.” Not a good sign for the delicate Theresa who is having enough trouble fitting in. Once the other girls discover that her mother is a cabaret singer (code for prostitute?), Theresa is teased unmercifully to the point that she has no option but to run away. Complicating her plan, however, are both Mme. Fourneau’s nice but creepy teenage son (John Moulder-Brown) who has a compulsive habit of spying on the girls, and the psycho who is slashing though the school’s population unnoticed by staff and students, as everyone assumes that the dead girls have simply run away.
The House That Screamed features a solid cast highlighted by strong female characters, prefiguring slasher classics like The House on Sorority Row. Palmer, Maude, and Galbó, also the star of great genre flicks What Have You Done to Solange?, Let Sleeping Corpses Lie, and The Killer Must Kill Again, are all outstanding. The film is beautifully shot by cinematographer Manuel Berenguer and atmospherically and suspensfully directed by Serrador. Each memorable murder is shot in a different style from the previous attack, giving each killing its own feel and style. Like Psycho, there is a shift in audience sympathy, but in House this happens more than once, allowing despicable characters to suddenly become sympathetic. Frequent reference has been made in the genre press to how this film was the inspiration for Dario Argento’s classic Suspira, but any specific inspiration seems to be related only to the gothic atmosphere and the murder-at-a-girls-school setting. POTENTIAL SPOILER: Most entertaining of all is the fact that the ending seems to have directly influenced that good times 80’s slasher Pieces. END POTENTIAL SPOILER.
Though the identity of the killer may not be too difficult to unravel, The House That Screamed is an excellent horror film that is unfortunately difficult to see in North America. Region 0 PAL copies are easier to come across, though the film is offered on a Region 1 NTSC Elvira’s Movie Macabre disc on a double bill with The Maneater of Hydra. Reportedly, though this disc is viewable in a version without Elvira’s jokey comments, the film fades to black any time an Elvira segment is due to appear. Ugh.
I’ve only ever been able to see The House That Screamed on two separate grey market discs that lose the letterboxing after the opening credits, and that both seemed to be duped from the same fuzzy videotape source. I would love to get my hands on a pristine widescreen copy of this awesome flick. And you should too. Enroll in The School That Screamed today to get a crash course in proto-slasher history. If you don’t, Mme. Fourneau and Irene will break out the Cat o’ Nine Tails. You’ve been warned.
Proto-Slashers: Looking at the flicks that paved the way for Halloween and the heyday of slasher movies.
Homicidal (1961)
I love William Castle movies… The Tingler, The House on Haunted Hill, Mr. Sardonicus, Macabre, I Saw What You Did, 13 Ghosts, The Night Walker, Straight-Jacket. I mean, what’s not to love? Castle made movies that attempted to give the horror audiences of the 50’s and 60’s what they wanted – fast paced fear flicks that genuinely tried to generate some thrills. Sure he had to resort to gimmicks sometimes, but that’s part of the fun. Whether is was wiring seats to gives movie goers a mild shock, or releasing a fake skeleton on a wire overhead, Castle went all out to deliver the goods.
After Hitchcock had a major hit with Psycho in 1960, Castle responded the following year by producing and directing Homicidal. To help lure audiences, Castle created the Fright Break and Coward’s Corner. Just before the film’s twist ending was revealed, a clock appeared on the screen accompanied by a voice over informing viewers that they had 45 seconds to leave the auditorium if they were too frightened to see what was coming next. Those who left would receive a full refund, but there was a catch. Walkouts would have to sit in Coward’s Corner, a booth in the theatre’s lobby. They would have to remain there until the movie was over and everyone else who was brave enough to see how Homicidal ended had walked past, undoubtedly jeering. But nah, I can’t imagine anyone opting for that humiliation.
Homicidal tells the story of a mysterious woman (Jean Arless) who checks into a hotel and offers the bellboy a large sum of money to marry her. He agrees, and after a murder occurs, we find out that the Mysterious Ms. lives in the small California community of Solvang where she cares for her husband’s wheelchair-bound former governess (Eugenie Leontovich). Why she does this, I dunno. Enter Arless’ husband, his sister (Patricia Breslin) and her boyfriend (Glenn Corbett), and the stage is set for a murder party straight out of the Psycho handbook. Just why all these murders take place is reveled in a convoluted twist ending that most audiences will have guessed long before the film’s end.
On my first viewing of Homicidal at a film festival a few years ago, I fell victim to a laughing fit as the film’s surprise became immediately apparent upon its introduction. It was a “Is everybody seeing this?” kind of moment. As it turns out, most people in attendance were indeed seeing the same thing I was, judging by the amount of knowing laughter spreading throughout the theatre. I can’t speak for everyone else at that screening, but I can tell you that I wasn’t laughing “at”Homicidal, but I was laughing at it’s audacity. I’ve always appreciated Castle’s willingness to put any and every over the top element he could think of up there on the screen in the name of entertainment. That’s something that some of the more outrageous slasher films would eagerly adhere to twenty years later, and it’s a reflection of Castle’s genuine showmanship. Castle’s horror movies always had a keen sense of entertainment delivered through their “stop at nothing” attitude that never truly looked down at their audiences. Instead, Castle’s flicks respected their audiences’ desire to have a good time and a few scares at the movies. Recently, I watched Homicidal again with a couple of pretty savvy movie viewers, and I was stunned when they didn’t catch on to the film’s twist until the end of the movie. It was good to know, however, that the movie could still work on the unsuspecting.
Homicidal is a fun viewing experience and a tiny step forward on the road from Psycho to Halloween. Its campy aspects are part of its charm. Even guessing the film’s twist shouldn’t stop you from enjoying the out of control plot and the film’s set pieces. A couple of the murders in particular come as a surprise even today. Following Psycho’s lead, one slash-a-thon especially comes out of the blue and features more black & white blood than expected, and another, using a trick Castle would repeat in Straight-Jacket, entails a body part being removed in silhouette.
Incredibly, Homicidal managed to end up on Time Magazine’s Best Films of the Year List, an honour the magazine had denied Hitchcock’s film a year earlier. So why not do like Time, and pay an over-the-top tribute to this proto-slasher yourself? Get your hands on the DVD, have some friends over, and recreate Coward’s Corner in your living room. Isn’t it time you had a Fright Break?
Proto-Slashers: Looking at the flicks that paved the way for Halloween and the heyday of slasher movies.
Hands of the Ripper (1971)
Suppose an infamous serial killer had a baby daughter who witnessed her father murder her mother. Years later, the memory of the event buried, the daughter commits a series of murders herself. That’s the premise of the 1971 Hammer thriller Hands of the Ripper, a terrific and not nearly famous enough late-era flick from the genre-defining British film studio.
As the title reveals, the serial killer/bad role model here is Jack the Ripper. Though his vaguely diseased and scarred face is seen only briefly in the film, appearing in the opening and in several quick flashbacks, his influence is felt throughout. In my books, madmen don’t come much creepier than the Whitechapel Murderer.
The plot really begins to get cooking when Anna (Angharad Rees), the Ripper’s daughter and now a young woman, is taken in by Dr. John Pritchard (Eric Porter). The good doc is obsessed (is there any other kind of doctor in horror flicks other than the obsessed ones?) with unraveling the secrets of the mind, especially those of the schizophrenic. Recognizing the signs of the disorder in Anna, the doctor sets out to cure her, developing a particularly unhealthy variety of codependency. As Anna begins killing, Dr. John (as Anna calls him) hides her crimes, allowing her to continue her murderous behavior.
Though we always know who the killer is, part of the grisly fun of Hands of the Ripper lies in waiting to see who will set Anna off and how. You see, each time the Junior Miss Ripper kills, she falls into a sort of catatonic trance first, facilitated by a kiss and a shiny object glistening in her eyes. It’s surprising how many ways screenwriter L.W. Davidson and storywriter Edward Spenser Shew find to bring these two elements together, happily ushering in yet another attack with yet another sharp object. When the killings do occur, they’re sudden and bloody, often catching the viewer off guard with their urgency.
Davidson and Shew have also given us interesting characters in Anna and Dr. John, as well as in some of the supporting characters. Anna, though a vicious killer, is sympathetic and likeable (when not slashing someone’s neck) and Dr. John is single-minded and purposefully blind to the danger he’s enabling, but with more than enough humanity to be a-okay otherwise. In bringing them together, Davidson and Shew have constructed a much more complex relationship than at first meets the eye.
Davidson/Shew and director Peter Sasdy make good use of the Whispering Gallery at London’s St. Paul’s Cathedral during the film’s climax. It works both as a dramatic setting and, on a more hoighty toighty note, as a metaphor laden with whispers and repeating cycles. Hitchcock would be proud of their use of local landmarks and Freudian hoo-haw. Of course, being a Hammer Horror, Hands of the Ripper is literate and thick with period atmosphere. Though this might all sound a little mellow or highbrow for some gorehounds’ tastes, my advice is to slow down and smell the… er, blood.
Hands of the Ripper is a neat twist on Slasher conventions even before Slasher movies proper existed. Unfortunately, it has yet to be available on Region 1 DVD. Resourceful Ripper freaks, however, can find VHS copies and DVD-R versions available online, and those with Region Free players can pick up the Region 2 disc. With any luck though, MGM’s Midnight Movies series might just see fit to release this flick into the hands of Ripper fans in North America too.